Top Menu

Menu

Networks


Source: National Broadband Map (NTIA / FCC)

In 2015 the Federal Communications Commission defined Broadband levels as 25 Mbps download / 3 Mbps upload. Based on 2014 data and the national standards, Vermont’s broadband coverage rate is reported by the FCC as just over 20%. However, as of August 2016 the Public Service Department reports that 72% of Vermont has converage that meets the 25/3 criteria. Nearly all of Vermont’s 295,000 residences and businesses have access to service defined as high speed internet.


Source: VT Dept of Public Service

The 2014 Vermont Telecommunications Plan calls for prioritizing any state funded support in terms of speed, starting with locations that lack service of 4/1 Mbps or better. Expanding coverage has been geared to ensuring some access for all, rather than prioritizing very high levels of service to “nodes” – residential and commercial activity centers. Broadband data is difficult to compare year to year, or even category to category. Some data sets define coverage as proximity (500′) to fiber and cable (real as well as potential connections). Other statistics reflect current connectivity – service actually delivered to a customer location. Vermont’s 2024 telecom goal is to have infrastructure capable of delivering symmetrical 100 Mbps (100/100) to all residential and business locations.


Source: VT Public Service Dept, VT Telecom Plan 2014

Vermont’s 2024 telecom goal is to have infrastructure capable of delivering symmetrical 100 Mbps (100/100) to all residential and business locations.


Source: VT Agency of Transportation

Vermont’s focus has been on improving its aging transportation infrastructure including road surfaces & bridge conditions, in order to maintain highway safety, particularly for winter travelers.


Source: VTrans

Public transit use in Vermont has increased 10% since 2010. In fiscal year 2017 Vermont’s state public transit systems provided over 4.6 million trips. Just over half of all rides are provided in the Chittenden County region. In terms of different transit services, over the past year tourism, demand response, volunteer driver, rural and intercity bus services saw positive ridership growth. The tourism routes, which suffered from a poor ski season in FY 2016, saw a 32% increase in FY 2017. Over the same time frame, urban, small town, and commuter services experienced moderate decreases in ridership.